Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 08:56

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
NBA 2K26 Summer League 2025 tips off July 10 in Las Vegas - NBA
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Liquid Glass tvOS redesign is restricted to second-generation Apple TV 4K and later - AppleInsider
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
VMware drops the lowest tier of its partner program – except in Europe - theregister.com
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
IPOs That Launched Like Rockets — and Those That Flew Straight Into a Wall - PYMNTS.com
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why does a straight man like anal penetration?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.